Reviewer:

Paper Title:

Authors:

1.CATEGORY

Within the scope of the Conference:

Summary type:

2. SUMMARY EVALUATION

Please use the scale from 0 (poor) to 5 (excellent)

Originality:

Technical / scientific value:

Clarity and suitability:

Global evaluation:

3. REVIEWER’S EXPERTISE

Give yourself a rating:

4. RECOMMENDATIONS

The paper should be:

If accepted the paper should be presented as:

5. COMMENTS TO THE AUTHORS

If rejected, the reviewer must state the reasons clearly and explicitly.
If accepted, suggestions to authors for improvement should be given.