Reviewer: Paper Title: Authors: 1.CATEGORY Within the scope of the Conference: Please select...YesNo Summary type: Please select...ScientificApplication-oriented 2. SUMMARY EVALUATION Please use the scale from 0 (poor) to 5 (excellent) Originality: Please select...0(poor)12345(excellent) Technical / scientific value: Please select...0(poor)12345(excellent) Clarity and suitability: Please select...0(poor)12345(excellent) Global evaluation: Please select...0(poor)12345(excellent) 3. REVIEWER’S EXPERTISE Give yourself a rating: Please select...expert in areafamiliarsomewhat familiarnot familiar with topic – can review for general interest 4. RECOMMENDATIONS The paper should be: Please select...AcceptedAccepted with minor changesConditionally accepted with major changesRejected If accepted the paper should be presented as: Please select...OralPoster 5. COMMENTS TO THE AUTHORS If rejected, the reviewer must state the reasons clearly and explicitly. If accepted, suggestions to authors for improvement should be given.